Grand Challenges for Innovation


The following list is based on presentations by leading scientists who participated at ICNPD-2011 and ICNPD-2012. A subset of these challenges will be a focus of ICNPD-2013.

Comments can be entered at the bottom and are highly encouraged.

Visual prosthetics challenges

Ethan Cohen:

In retinal stimulation, how can the activation of neural fibers and Mueller glia be avoided?

In retinal stimulation, can the pattern of electrical stimulation accommodate for morphological/physiological changes in diseased retinal tissue?

How can the E-field blurring (i.e. mismatch between the size of stimulating electrode and phosphene visual field) be avoided in retinal stimulation?


Helmut Sachs:

How much does retinal and cortical remodeling in long-term visual loss/injury affects the functionality of the implant?

Eyes constantly move during saccades. To improve the long-term stability of retinal implants in the eye, would it be advantageous to use a stabilizing pad on the cable or to glue the corneal incision?


Jong-Mo Seo:

In human trials of visual prosthetics, which psychophysical measures are most relevant and should be widely adopted?


Phil Troyk:

Can humans get visual percepts from phosphene primitives?


Auditory and vestibular prosthetics challenges

Andrew Wise:

How long after the hearing loss, the neurons in the spiral ganglion remain viable for a successful use of cochlear implant?


Brett Swanson:

Since neither temporal nor spatial pitch encoding in a cochlear implant (CI) can reproduce the harmonics and phase shifts present in natural pitch perception, perhaps the multipolar “phased array” stimulation with spatio-temporal encoding can provide a more natural-sounding pitch perception?

Perhaps the use of multipolar “phased array” stimulation may reduce the current spread?

How much of spatio-temporal encoding is smeared/blurred by current spread from adjacent electrodes?


Paul Carter:

Why the monopolar stimulation in CI is five times more effective than bipolar, even though biplolar stimulation is more spatially restricted and thus supposedly more tone-selective?

Why analog stimulation in CI is not as effective in practice as the theory would predict?

Why usually there are no more than 7-10 independent functional channels?

Does the current spread determine the limit of current steering?


Della Santina:

Can a cochlear or vestibular implant based on intra-neural high-density micromachined electrode arrays deliver greater performance (e.g. more functional channels) than one using traditional intra-lumenal electrodes?


Americo Migliaccio:

How can the inhibitory signaling in semicircular canals be implemented in a vestibular prosthesis? (e.g. by maintaining a high resting firing rate at a cost of reduced dynamic rage and increased power consumption?)


Motor/BMI prosthetics challenges

Karim Oweiss:

In developing a closed-loop bi-directional brain neural interface, how can the causality be established between the electrical microstimulation and readout that avoids the confounding influence of unrelated spontaneous neural activity?

Might the activity in the somatosensory cortex be too heterogeneous, time-varying, and otherwise complex to be successfully decoded in real time for enabling an effective brain-machine interface?


Ranu Jung:

Is it possible to implement an adaptive closed-loop control of paralyzed limbs after spinal cord injury using a controller based on real-time co-adaptive model of the spinal motor pattern generator?


Challenges in neuromodulation for pain control

Winnie Jensen:

Can selective electrical stimulation of afferent fibers in the nerves from an amputated limb can generate an artificial sensation suppresses the phantom limb pain? (e.g. Stimulation of which afferent fiber type would be most effective – touch or proprioception of static joint position or joint movement?)


John Parker:

Is the pain relief in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) due mostly to antidromic rather than orthodromic stimulation?

For implementing the closed-loop SCS, how to overcome the confounding effects of varying distances of stimulating electrode and recording electrode to the spinal cord during the change in posture? (e.g. can it be accounted for by performing an initial calibration with posture-dependent recruitment curves?)


Nick Donaldson:

Is the additional complexity of recording from posterior (dorsal) roots is necessary considering that dorsal rhizotomy procedure works well despite its negative perception by some patients and neurologists.


Electrode-tissue interface challenges

Andrew Wise:

Can the neurotrophic drugs be used to improve an interface between the electrode and neural tissue?


Kevin Bennet:

How to reduce biofouling of the electrode surface for long-term electrochemical sensing?


Stuart Cogan:

What charge transfer processes contribute to the measured voltage transient of an electrode pulsed in vivo and how to quantify these processes? (E.g. tissue resistance, concentration and activation overpotentials, cell capacitance, cable capacitance, current leakage paths, shift in equilibrium potential of redox state; side reactions)

For chronically implanted stimulating electrodes, how to determine the safe limit of polarization and what are its key contributors? (Is it primarily due to reduced counter-ion transport?)


Doug McCreery:

How small can the stimulating electrode be made without compromising its ability to inject sufficient charge to neurons around the glial scar? (~50 μm diameter for SIROF electrodes?)


Gregg Suaning:

How can we effectively combine the expertise in device engineering, electrochemistry (charge delivery through complex tissue geometry), and materials science for making optimal neural implants?


Insulation and encapsulation challenges

Gregg Suaning:

Which mechanisms contribute to gradual degradation of polyimide-based electrodes and cables? (E.g. delamination?)


Gregg Suaning and Stuart Cogan:

How can the materials selection and electrode design reduce the gradual degradation of electrode insulation in vivo (E.g. silicon carbide?)


Stuart Cogan:

How to detect early defects/leakage in insulation and pinpoint their location (at the electrode, bonding area, cable, and/or connector), as they are not easily distinguished by any available methods – EIS, CV, or cross-talk measurements?


Packaging challenges

Phil Troyk:

How can we achieve reliable high-density feedthroughs for a cortical prosthetic device with a channel count up to 1000?

How can we measure the helium leakage rate in a subminiature hermetic package (less than 1 cubic mm)?

  3 Responses to “Grand Challenges for Innovation”

  1. Neural recording and neural stimulation with extra cellular electrodes often target two different cell populations. How can the right target cells be mapped?

    Can the electrode surface morphology affect the electrode-tissue interaction?

    • Dear Yael,
      The electrode surface morphology definately affects the electrode-tissue interaction. Now I am not a tissue person but in the team that I work with we do investigate this at the moment. Let’s discuss the topic at the conference!

  2. Heya i’m for the primary time here. I found this board and I in finding It truly helpful & it helped
    me out much. I hope to provide one thing again and help
    others such as you aided me.

 Leave a Reply



You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>